Street Photography: New York City, St Patrick’s Day Weekend 2012

Tags

, , ,

Share

My wife and I celebrated our 14th wedding anniversary this year by visiting New York City. We had a very good time!

Being a photographer who likes to shoot street photography, I took some shots while we walked and traveled about the city. In an effort to stave off being too blatant in my photography during our stay (which was supposed to be more about our anniversary than about me taking photos!), I brought along my compact Olympus point-and-shoot that I could keep in a little pouch at my side most of the time.

I’ve now uploaded most of the ones I liked or which had some special meaning. Maybe a few more, but these are the majority of the ones I’ll be uploading.



Visit Michael's Art Photography Portfolio at SaatchiArt.com!

Michael Grace-Martin Print at Jennifer Schwartz Gallery “Lust” Exhibit

Tags

, , , , , , , ,

Share

Emerge (2006) by Michael Grace-Martin

Michael’s 2006 photo print titled “Emerge” is being included the Lust exhibit opening this Friday (March 23, 2012) at the Jennifer Schwartz Gallery in Atlanta, Georgia!



Visit Michael's Art Photography Portfolio at SaatchiArt.com!

Image

Photo: View from a Train

Share

View from a Train, Schenectady, NY, March 2012 (© Michael Grace-Martin)

[Click to see large]



Visit Michael's Art Photography Portfolio at SaatchiArt.com!

Book Review: Cindy Sherman’s Untitled Film Stills

Tags

, , , , , ,

Share

Untitled Film Still #21, 1978 (©1997 The Museum of Modern Art, New York)

I recently saw the Cindy Sherman Retrospective at the Museum of Modern Art (MOMA) in New York. (By the way, I highly recommend seeing it if you haven’t.)

One phase of her work presented in the exhibit was her black & white “film stills”. Sherman started these in 1977 when she was twenty-three and completed the series in 1980.

Untitled Film Still #35, 1979 (©1997 The Museum of Modern Art, New York)

I liked this phase enough that I actually purchased the book published by MOMA containing the entire series.

The book begins with an essay by Sherman about the making of this series. She talks about how it was probably influenced by her extensive exposure to television as a child. Her time working for the experimental filmmaker Paul Sharits at the State College at Buffalo was also an influence.

Untitled Film Still #7. 1978 (©1997 The Museum of Modern Art, New York)

She gives some history of her studio work environment, both in Buffalo and later in New York City. She got a part-time job at Artists Space, which helped to pay her rent and also kept her in touch with contemporary art and the gallery scene.

Untitled Film Still #6. 1977 (©1997 The Museum of Modern Art, New York)

She gives more history and then gets into the details of how many of the individual images were made. I found it all quite interesting because it gives you a good idea what was going through her head when she made this series.

Untitled Film Still #3. 1977 (©1997 The Museum of Modern Art, New York)

I would like to point out three things she mentions that I found particularly interesting…

  1. She had various people helping her take these photos (including her father), and they were not experienced photographers. Sherman says she made sure they framed the shots with lots of room around her so she could crop it the way she wanted afterward…and some were cropped extensively!
  2. Her negatives were technically quite bad and required a lot of dodging and burning, much to her printers’ chagrin.
  3. She admits that she’s gotten “a little sick of these pictures” because [I presume] she’s looked them over so much, she’d rather not have to keep looking at them!

Untitled Film Still #14, 1978 (©1997 The Museum of Modern Art, New York)

I really enjoyed this book and the inside view it gives of Sherman’s thoughts, intentions, methods, and environment. I would recommend it to anyone who enjoys fine art photography or aspires to create fine art photographs, even if you are not interested in the genre of “self-portraits” that her work primarily falls into.

Untitled Film Still #48, 1979 (©1997 The Museum of Modern Art, New York)

It’s a seemingly honest and informative book about what goes on in the mind and life of a hugely successful art photographer. And if you enjoy black & white photos, they’re great to look at, regardless of whether the negatives suck…:-).

You can purchase this book at the MOMA bookstore.

 



Visit Michael's Art Photography Portfolio at SaatchiArt.com!

Everyone is a Photographer Now

Tags

,

Share

It used to be
a photograph wasn’t free
and the method was surrounded by mystery.

But then Kodak said
just press a button,
we will do the rest
making your photos look their best.

And Land tried his hand
making the Polaroid cam
which many found hard
to avoid.

But it was the computer mob
that did the job,
with its electrons
the camera maker dons.

Now they’re in every device
like an infestation of lice,
and…

Everyone is a Photographer Now.

–(c) Michael Grace-Martin

[See a related post at another blog]

 



Visit Michael's Art Photography Portfolio at SaatchiArt.com!

Candid Photography and Signal Detection Theory

Tags

, , ,

Share

I have a background in Cognitive Psychology (M.A.) and it occurred to me that candid photography–whether it be street photography or candid event photography–is in fact an act of “signal detection”.

For those unfamiliar with signal detection theory, here’s a simple description from a Hanover College Psychology web page:

A person is faced with a stimulus that is very faint or confusing.  For simplicity’s sake lets us call this stimulus a signal.  The person must make a decision, is the signal there or not.  What makes this situation confusing and difficult is the presences of other mess that is similar to the signal.  Let us call this mess noise.

What makes this different from traditional threshold theories is that the subject makes a decision, a cognitive act, as to whether the signal is present or not.  This basic sensory act of determining if a stimulus occurred now is understood to have a cognitive component.

As a photographer, the signal you are trying to detect is “a good and/or interesting photograph”. However, there are usually lots of visual stimuli available in the immediate surroundings (i.e., “noise” or “mess”), and successfully identifying a “signal” (in our case, a good or interesting photograph) in this “mess” of stimuli often requires an experienced and/or trained eye.

Not only do you have the photographer’s training and experience to consider, but there’s also the situation itself.

In my experience, situations can vary greatly in terms of signal. At an event like a fashion show, festival, or parade there’s commonly a lot of “signal” available–i.e., many good or interesting photo possibilities present. In other situations, you may find it difficult to find *any* signal/good photos due to poor lighting, plain surrounds, lack of activity, etc.

One of the biggest challenges for a professional photographer is to find whatever “signal” is available regardless of the situation and the presence of distracting or misleading stimuli that are mere “noise”. Sometimes, this requires quite of bit of imagination and creative visualization.

One of my most satisfying experiences as a photographer is finding or detecting “signal” where others see only “noise”.

Maybe psychology is in fact a great background for a photographer…;p.



Visit Michael's Art Photography Portfolio at SaatchiArt.com!