Tags
Auditorium in Red by Michael Grace-Martin
24 Thursday Jan 2013
Posted Fashion/Glamour, MGM's Photos
in≈ Comments Off on Auditorium in Red by Michael Grace-Martin
24 Thursday Jan 2013
Posted Fashion/Glamour, MGM's Photos
in≈ Comments Off on Auditorium in Red by Michael Grace-Martin
Tags
20 Sunday Jan 2013
Posted Fashion/Glamour, MGM's Photos
in≈ Comments Off on Everyday Glam by Michael Grace-Martin
Tags
Everyday Glam
(photos by Michael Grace-Martin)
The best I can tell, “glamour” is some blend of fashion and sex appeal. The amount of clothing involved can be very little (e.g., skimpy lingerie) or even nothing, or offer fairly comprehensive body coverage, as long as it does so in a sexually provocative manner. In all cases, glamour seems aimed at going beyond the “everyday” in a sexy and captivating direction.
Usually, glamour is associated with beautifully dressed people, striking dramatic and sexy poses in special circumstances, like fashion shoots, fashion shows, celebrity events, or fancy balls to name a few.
But what if glamour were combined with everyday tasks and events, like taking the garbage can to the curb or sweeping the kitchen floor? What if it wasn’t just for exclusive occasions when people are getting together to hobnob with others all trying to look their sexy best?
What you would have, my friends, is Everyday Glam: Glamour as an antidote to everyday life.
(Modeling Credits: Parker Day, Nikki Holland, Amanda Marie, Jaime Warburton, and a few others..)
Two options:
1. View the Photos as a vertically scrolling page
2. View the Photos as a full screen slide show (click first thumbnail below)
![]() Visit Michael's Art Photography Portfolio at SaatchiArt.com! |
08 Tuesday May 2012
Posted All, Fashion/Glamour, MGM's Photos
in≈ Comments Off on Cazenovia College Fashion Show 2012
I had been photographing the annual fashion show at Cornell University for several years and thought it would be interesting to photograph another college fashion show to see how they compared and differed. I discovered that Cazenovia College (about an hour from my home) also had an annual fashion show and indicated my interest in coming and photographing the show.
Well, it turned out their fashion show was the very same day as Cornell’s fashion show; so I had to decline.
That was last year.
This year (2012), Cazenovia’s show was scheduled for the weekend before Cornell’s. So I got to do both!
For the Cornell show, I’ve been focusing more on what happens behind the scenes (back stage), while I have an associate photographer photograph the runway show.
Since Cazenovia was going to have two sessions of the show (one in the afternoon, one in the evening), I decided I would photograph the afternoon show and then photograph the behind-the-scenes activities leading up to the evening show.
Photographing the afternoon runway show went well. But when I went back stage to photograph behind-the-scenes, I discovered that the designers and models were spread out into several different small rooms connected by narrow hallways.
Not only was it difficult to travel between rooms without bumping into designers and models, but my presence was *really* obvious in any of the individual small rooms, making candid photography nearly impossible.
At the Cornell fashion show, all the designers and models are in one huge room…making it quite easy to walk around and grab candids wherever you see something interesting going on.
Needless to say, I didn’t do much behind-the-scenes photography at Cazenovia (I left early) but I did grab a few shots. And the runway show itself featured some pretty eye-catching attire!
Some of my favorite photos from both the runway show and back stage are featured below…:-).
![]() Visit Michael's Art Photography Portfolio at SaatchiArt.com! |
29 Sunday Apr 2012
Posted All, Fashion/Glamour, MGM's Photos
in≈ Comments Off on Fashion Show Back Stage Photos 2012
Well, it’s become an annual ritual for me to photograph the annual fashion show at the local university. I used to take photos back stage until the actual show started; then I would move out front and take runway photos during the show.
For the past two years, I’ve been working with other photographers who photograph the show while I stay back stage during the show.
Fashion show runway photos can be quite amazing at these shows, but I find the back stage photos are more creatively interesting for me.
In any case, I’m going to post some of my 2012 back stage photos here. I’ll upload more over the next few days…:-).
![]() Visit Michael's Art Photography Portfolio at SaatchiArt.com! |
04 Wednesday Apr 2012
Posted All, Fashion/Glamour, MGM's Photos
in≈ Comments Off on Fashion/”Film” Photo Shoot
Tags
After a lot of discussions over email and Facebook, I was finally able to arrange a photo shoot with Liz and Danielle.
We were working with a couple of scenario “concepts” that I’ll be explaining in a little more detail shortly. Also, I’ll be providing many more photos from the shoot.
In the meantime, here are a few photos from the photo session to get things started…:-).
![]() Visit Michael's Art Photography Portfolio at SaatchiArt.com! |
08 Thursday Dec 2011
(1/14/2014) Note: apparently, the photos we linked to are no longer available. We’ll see if we can re-link to them somehow.
“An abandoned western gold rush town sets the stage for a photographic fantasy of three beautiful young women.” Ghost Town is the result of Stephan Würth’s lifelong fascination with the American West. — Clic bookstore & gallery
(Note: this review is based on the 21 photos from the book that *were* displayed at Stephan Würth’s website.)
It would appear that Stephan’s main body of work is in fashion photography; all of the photographs included in his “portfolios” section at his website are fashion-related at the time this review is being written.
Though some of the book’s photos remind me of Playboy-esque soft porn, there’s sufficient artistry in his treatment of the subject matter to bring it back into a primarily art-oriented enterprise–though with a fairly obvious sexual fantasy targeted undercurrent.
I am sure we could endlessly debate whether these photos are “art” or soft porn. I am OK with leaving this an open question.
What I wonder about more than the art versus porn question is what Würth’s conceptual and visual goals were with this project? For example, take a look at the following two photos from the book:
These two photos–and there are more of this sort–seem to be here simply to remind us that we’re in a western ghost town, people; forget those naked women for a moment!
There are a number of purely artsy “detail”-type shots (e.g., a table outside on the plains with a framed photograph of a man that seems to date from early cowboy days) whose purpose seems primarily decorative.
Then, there are these very fashion-oriented photos. For example:
There are also some photos of the women that seem very posed and isolated from the ghost town context (e.g., there’s one of a totally nude woman seated on a chair with a plain canvas backdrop…fairly disconnected from her surroundings).
What it comes down to is this: he seems to be going in 3 or 4 different directions at once with these photos, which I think ends up diluting their overall effect.
Don’t get me wrong…I think he’s got some nice photographs in this book. The problem is they seem loosely put together without a clear visual or conceptual direction. Sure they’re all black & white photos–and maybe they all took place in a single ghost town location–but I don’t think that ensures the sort of continuity the human mind yearns for in a singular book-based project.
Does this review mean you shouldn’t purchase the book? Not necessarily. It’s just what I think; you can make up your own mind.
You can see more of Stephan Würth’s Ghost Town project and book at his website. It’s available for purchase at Clic Bookstore & Gallery and other booksellers.
![]() Visit Michael's Art Photography Portfolio at SaatchiArt.com! |
19 Monday Apr 2010
Posted All, Commentary, Fashion/Glamour, MGM's Photos
inTags
70-200 f/2.8 lens, f/2.8, 500 ISO, 1/400 sec
So I shot my annual fashion show…the one I’ve been doing the past 5 years. It’s always in early Spring, so I tend to use it as a warm-up for wedding and portrait season, and also to test new equipment. I titled this post “Even *more* lessons learned” because I’ve blogged about fashion photography lessons learned in a previous post.
Honestly, my favorite part is capturing back stage candids (my *next* blog post will feature my back stage photos and lessons, so stay tuned…). Photographing the show is mostly a matter of workin’ the equipment: bam, bam, bam! Sure, this machine-like gun operation of my camera and lenses is a relatively good way to see what the equipment can and cannot do, but it’s not particularly creative. That said, I do tend to look for something other than the straight on, one model filling the frame types of shots; it makes it more interesting for me.
Anyway, this year I decided to shoot the whole show (well, OK, I was only there until the first intermission) with one lens and one camera. In previous years, I’ve shot with two cameras, one connected to a 24-70 zoom lens and the other to a 70-200 zoom lens, and stood about 8 feet away from the end of the runway (i.e., quite near it) with 20 other photographers.
My plan this year was to stand further back on a small step ladder with my 70-200 f/2.8 IS lens attached to my new Canon 1D Mark IV that I wanted to test out. I placed the ladder adjacent to the corner of the stage where in years past, the models came for their final poses before returning back up the runway.
70-200 f/2.8 lens, f/2.8, 500 ISO, 1/400 sec
Unfortunately, the show organizers decided to switch things up; they decided to have models end up at the “other” corner of the stage before returning back up the runway. I, of course, didn’t realize this until the show started and I saw what was happening.
So, lesson learned: talk to fashion show organizers each year about the planned “traffic pattern” on the catwalk because it may not stay the same from year to year. It’s not always easy to find a fashion show representative who actually knows this sort of information; but it’s worth the effort. Also, if you see a designated show videographer in some optimal, cushy location near the stage or on an elevated platform, you can be pretty sure *he’ll* know!
70-200 f/2.8 lens, f/2.8, 1600 ISO, 1/400 sec
Anyway, I didn’t want to stay at the transition corner; I wanted to be at the final posing corner. So I moved my step ladder in the aisle toward the other stage corner. Well, wouldn’t you know that someone in the audience was pretty darned annoyed at where I was standing on my ladder and told me so.
Because I didn’t really want to be yet another annoying photographer getting in everyone’s way, I crouched down the rest of the show (well, the rest of the first half of the show) and took many photos of the models on the stage with audience heads creeping up ever-so-slightly into the bottom part of the photos, sometimes obscuring the model’s feet. This wasn’t optimal, obviously, but some of the designers and models still bought my photos; so it wasn’t a total wash.
70-200 f/2.8 lens, f/3.2, 2000 ISO, 1/400 sec
What worked and what would I do differently next time?
First, I still like standing back further from the stage–than the other 20-30 photographers taking close-ups of the models right *at* the stage–and using one camera and one long telephoto lens (for me, the 70-200 f/2.8 IS). This allows me to more easily get photos of the models almost anywhere on the stage and they don’t all of to be close-ups. I noticed one photographer was sharing the stand the videographer was on, which was in a perfect location of my one telephoto lens strategy. I’ll have to do some sucking up to the videographer next year…:p.
Compared to last year, instead of shooting in manual exposure mode with a fixed ISO, I shot using auto ISO. The lighting on the runway is quite uneven; so a fixed manual exposure doesn’t work too well, unless you’re only taking photos at the end of the runway. Even then, there are differences depending on where the model is standing. I’ve noticed when I’m shooting with a longer lens, the camera does a better job with exposure because no one part of the scene–which may be quite a bit darker or lighter than the rest of the scene (this commonly happens when the model is wearing white or black clothing or has particularly pale or dark skin)–dominates the frame as it does when you’re close up.
70-200 f/2.8 lens, f/2.8, 1600 ISO, 1/400 sec
I should explain a little more about my camera setting: I was using a Canon 1D Mark IV, which allows you to put the camera in manual mode, but with the ISO set to Auto. The great thing about this is that you can put the aperture and shutter speed at some fixed settings (e.g., f/3.2 and 1/400 sec) and let the camera adjust exposure by raising or lowering the ISO. In effect, it’s like you’re able to shoot in both aperture priority and shutter priority simultaneously. I found that keeping the aperture relatively large (f/2.8 – f/3.5, mostly to keep the ISO from going too high) and the shutter speed relatively high (1/200-1/400 sec, especially when photographing the models *while* they moved down the runway) worked out quite well.
70-200 f/2.8 lens, f/3.2, 640 ISO, 1/400 sec
If I didn’t have a camera that does auto ISO in manual mode, I’d probably shoot in aperture priority mode and keep the shutter near it’s max…again, if I’m using a relatively long/telephoto lens.
That’s it for now. My next blog post (within the next week) will feature my back stage photos and lessons. In the meantime, I’ll finish this post with a few more shots of the show (click on the thumbnails to see them larger).
![]() Visit Michael's Art Photography Portfolio at SaatchiArt.com! |
09 Thursday Apr 2009
Posted All, Commentary, Fashion/Glamour, MGM's Photos
inTags
Over the past four years, I’ve been photographing the fashion show put on by the Cornell Design League (CDL) at Cornell University early each Spring. This is always a “dead” time of the year for photography up here in the Northeast, so I do it as a warmup and chance to test new equipment for my weddings and portrait sessions that begin in earnest in May.
Neither the CDL nor Cornell University pays me anything up front to photograph the event, but I often make *some* money from print sales to designers, models, and their relatives, and digital sales to media organizations, like the Cornell Chronicle.
After photographing four years of shows, I’ve learned a bit about what works and doesn’t work when it comes to fashion show photography.
Backstage
Before the show even begins, I like to go backstage and take “getting ready” photos. Much like the “getting ready” photos I often take during the weddings I photograph, these are candid photos of the emotional and
sometimes quirky things that go on before the “big event”. I find them to be more interesting than photographing the event itself, because it’s all unstaged. However, there are commonly special challenges presented during this phase.
![]() Canon 5D, 70-200 f/2.8L IS, f/2.8, 1/100 sec,
aperture priority, 1250 ISO |
![]() Canon 5D, 70-200 f/2.8L IS, f/2.8, 1/60 sec,
aperture priority, 1600 ISO
|
The Cornell fashion show takes place in a large gymnasium-type building with lights 25 feet up near the high ceiling. Even when these are on–they turn them off 45 minutes or so before the show–it’s pretty dark back behind the main stage where everyone is getting ready. Some of the designers bring their own lights because it’s so dark. Needless to say, the lighting is usually insufficient and uneven. And I resist using my flash because it destroys the ambience and candidness of the moment.
So, commonly, I’m pushing the limits of my equipment. It’s not uncommon for me to have to open my aperture to its maximum setting of f/2.8 and dial the ISO up to 3200. Even then, the shutter speed for proper exposure can be 1/30, which is pretty slow, even with Image Stabilization (IS). So, the biggest challenge is getting them sharp! A monopod wouldn’t be a bad idea; I usually just steady and brace myself and take 2-3 shots in a row and keep the best one.
![]() Canon 5D, 70-200 f/2.8L IS, f/2.8, 1/100 sec,
aperture priority, 1600 ISO |
![]() Canon 5D, 70-200 f/2.8L IS, f/2.8, 1/400 sec,
aperture priority, 3200 ISO
|
Show Time – Finding and Securing a Position
Though I haven’t been good about this myself, it’s really a good idea to get to the runway/cat walk early to check out different positions to take before the show starts…and then *reserve* the best spot you can find. I haven’t tried this, but I bet I could put an official-looking sign that says something like: “Reserved for Show Photographer” on the best seat near the stage to keep anyone from sitting there. If that’s not possible, you could bring someone and have them sit there until the show starts and then move to let you in. All this assumes “open seating” and will vary from fashion show to fashion show. It also wouldn’t hurt to talk to the show organizers and see if they might reserve a spot for you.
In any case, you’ll want a relatively central spot near the end of the runway. Personally, I like being slightly off-center because I find a slight angle to be more interesting than straight-on shots. Also, you probably don’t want to be right *at* the stage, if that’s even possible. If you’re right at the stage/runway, you’ll have to use a small aperture and wide angle focus length, which is a bad combination in terms of perspective/distortion, shutter speed, and depth of focus. It’s best to be 4 feet or more back and use a normal or telephoto lens. More on lenses next…
![]() Canon 5D, 70-200 f/2.8L IS, f/3.5, 1/60 sec,
manual exposure, 250 ISO |
![]() Canon 1DS Mark II, 24-70 f/2.8L, f/5.6, 1/80 sec,
manual exposure, 250 ISO
|
Cameras and Lenses
The last two years, I’ve brought two cameras with me and put a standard zoom (24-70mm or 24-105mm) on one camera and a telephoto zoom (70-200mm or 80-200mm) on the other. I then catch some shots as they first start down the runway with the telephoto lens, and then switch to the standard zoom for the posed shots at the end of the runway. (Tip: be sure to time synch the cameras just before the show so that all the images from both cameras are easily time sequenced afterward.) In the two previous years I shot with one camera connected to a 80-200 f/2.8L lens, a 1.6 crop factor DSLR, and positioned myself well back from the end of the runway. I think the ideal one camera + lens combo would be a 70-200mm lens on a full-frame DSLR and then position yourself within 10 feet of the runway. 70mm on a full-frame camera isn’t so far from a normal (50mm) perspective, and you still have the 200mm to catch them at the beginning of their stroll. If I photograph the show again next year, I think I’ll try this latter one camera configuration. Even though it’s nice to get some of the wide angle shots afforded by the 24-70 on a full-frame camera, I’d be able to get at least 85% of the shots I’d want with only one camera and lens.
Lighting
The lighting at fashion shows is reasonably good because, presumedly, the designers want the audience to be able to clearly see the clothes they designed! Due to this fact and my fear of annoying everyone around me with my flash, I seldom use flash at a fashion show. Sometimes, however, there are dark areas near the end of the runway that the lighting setup people have missed. If you experience this situation at a fashion show and you have brought two cameras, you can attach the flash to the camera with the standard zoom (e.g., 24-70) and use it only when the models step into the dark area/s when they get near you at the end of the runway.
Uneven Lighting
Even if the lighting is sufficient to keep your camera’s ISO settings below 800, it can vary along the runway. Also, occasionally they will allow different designers to incorporate different lighting effects into their presentations. This can wreak havoc with your exposures if you’re using a manual exposure setting! So, let’s talk about camera settings…
Camera Settings
Even though I was using shutter speeds of 1/60 and 1/80 sec this last show (I wasn’t thinking straight because I was coming down with a cold), I advise using shutter speeds of 1/200 sec or faster….especially when catching them during their long walk down the runway. They’ll be moving–sometimes running and dancing!–and you want some nice sharp detail. Your aperture for the distant shots when they first start down the runway can be quite large–e.g., f/4.0 or even f/2.8 is not usually problematic. But once they get close to you (like within 10 feet), you’ll want f/6.3 or f/5.6. If you’re using two cameras, the one with the telephoto lens can have the larger aperture and the other one should have the relatively small aperture. If you’re shooting with only one camera, you would be well advised to go with the smaller aperture (f/6.3 or f/5.6) and leave it there.
![]() Canon 1DS Mark II, 24-70 f/2.8L, f/6.3, 1/80 sec,
manual exposure, 250 ISO |
![]() Canon 5D, 70-200 f/2.8L IS, f/3.5, 1/60 sec,
manual exposure, 250 ISO
|
The biggest question to me in terms of camera setting is which camera mode to use..? The last two years, I’ve photographed the show in manual exposure mode. The goal was to reduce the amount of image processing needed after the show. However, I’ve run into two problems that have undermined this goal: 1) the uneven lighting along the runway means I get darker and lighter photos depending on the variation in light, and 2) I occasionally bump either the shutter or aperture setting and end up with bad exposures.
The main reason for #2 is, I believe, because I’m using two cameras and all those camera switches end up in accidental alterations of settings (due to jostling). I could solve this problem by using only one camera, or putting tape over the controls that keep getting bumped to help keep them in place. The only solution for problem #1 (short of changing the manual settings *as* they walk down the runway!) is to switch to either aperture-priority or shutter-priority mode. So, why don’t I just do that?
![]() Canon 1DS Mark II, 24-70 f/2.8L, f/5.6, 1/50 sec,
manual exposure, 200 ISO |
![]() Canon 5D, 70-200 f/2.8L IS, f/3.2, 1/60 sec,
manual exposure, 160 ISO
|
I photographed the first two years of fashion shows in aperture priority. But when a model walks out in a pure white or dark black outfit, the exposure the camera calculates automatically can be seriously off! Using shutter-priority makes a lot of sense in some ways–because you know you want to maintain a relatively high shutter speed–but the camera is still calculating the exposure and can be as far off as aperture priority mode. Of course you can also play around with the type of metering the camera is doing (spot, partial, average, etc), but I’ve found that all of them are off in *some* situations.
Unless the lighting varies a *lot*, I think I still prefer manual exposure for the best overall results. But shoot in raw format to best allow for exposure adjustments in post-processing. Also, if you are shooting with two cameras, you can optimize the one with the telephoto lens for the lighting at the beginning and/or middle of the runway, and the other camera with the standard/normal lens for the lighting at the end of the runway.
So those are my tips and “lessons learned”. I hope they help you should you too come across the opportunity to shoot a fashion show. Fashion shows can definitely be interesting and a lot of fun!..:-).
![]() Visit Michael's Art Photography Portfolio at SaatchiArt.com! |